Ian Hurd and Bret Stephens: The Chickenhawks out in Full Force 2013

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Ian Hurd and Bret Stephens: The Chickenhawks out in Full Force 2013

Post by Admin on Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:43 am

2013 2013 2013 <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VqNBLkUo4FI/Uh5erF2vn9I/AAAAAAAAEgk/soRbtP4QSkA/s1600/chickenhawks.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VqNBLkUo4FI/Uh5erF2vn9I/AAAAAAAAEgk/soRbtP4QSkA/s400/chickenhawks.PNG" width="331" /></a></div><br /><br />In the latest round of Syria-related news it seems the fabled chickenhawks have decided to rear their cowardly heads, intent upon promoting war to increase the readership of the news cycle, while in the relative comfort of their bachelor pads.<br /><br />Indeed, there are a lot of people online (none of whom have ever seen or would ever survive combat) who seem to get an absurd euphoria off the idea of projecting American power/Crushing some muslims/ whatever else makes them feel like part of the "winning team."<br /><br />That these idiots don't care about civilian casualties is clear- they probably think war is a bit like a videogame where the non-hostile targets are interchangeable, homogeneous, and regenerate over time.<br /><br />First there's Ian Hurd's <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html">insanely distatseful warmongering New York Times article</a> and secondly a piece from <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323407104579036740023927518.html">Bret Stephen's at the Wall Street Journal.</a><br /><br />The irony being that if Bush was still the president they'd be railing against any type of action in Syria, decrying it as warmongering, and likely attacking journalists with views they themselves are now expressing on behalf of a frenetic white house that is barely coping with public outcry.<br /><br />It has gotten to the point where the government seems poised to ignore the population at large (only 9% of people in the nation support any kind of intervention at all.) Something which should gravely concern us all, considering they're going to waste our tax dollars firing missiles in a sort of international manliness contest.<br> 2013 2013 2013 <br><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VqNBLkUo4FI/Uh5erF2vn9I/AAAAAAAAEgk/soRbtP4QSkA/s1600/chickenhawks.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VqNBLkUo4FI/Uh5erF2vn9I/AAAAAAAAEgk/soRbtP4QSkA/s400/chickenhawks.PNG" width="331" /></a></div><br /><br />In the latest round of Syria-related news it seems the fabled chickenhawks have decided to rear their cowardly heads, intent upon promoting war to increase the readership of the news cycle, while in the relative comfort of their bachelor pads.<br /><br />Indeed, there are a lot of people online (none of whom have ever seen or would ever survive combat) who seem to get an absurd euphoria off the idea of projecting American power/Crushing some muslims/ whatever else makes them feel like part of the "winning team."<br /><br />That these idiots don't care about civilian casualties is clear- they probably think war is a bit like a videogame where the non-hostile targets are interchangeable, homogeneous, and regenerate over time.<br /><br />First there's Ian Hurd's <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html">insanely distatseful warmongering New York Times article</a> and secondly a piece from <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323407104579036740023927518.html">Bret Stephen's at the Wall Street Journal.</a><br /><br />The irony being that if Bush was still the president they'd be railing against any type of action in Syria, decrying it as warmongering, and likely attacking journalists with views they themselves are now expressing on behalf of a frenetic white house that is barely coping with public outcry.<br /><br />It has gotten to the point where the government seems poised to ignore the population at large (only 9% of people in the nation support any kind of intervention at all.) Something which should gravely concern us all, considering they're going to waste our tax dollars firing missiles in a sort of international manliness contest.<br>2013 2013 2013 <br> <a href="http://www.matrixar.com/" title="Matrix ">المصفوفة : أجمل الخلفيات والصور</a>

Admin
Admin

Posts : 64122
Join date : 2013-02-22

View user profile http://prowebsites1.forumaroc.net

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum