Radio stalemate 2013

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Radio stalemate 2013

Post by Admin on Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:17 am

2013 2013 2013 <table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cdn1.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net/2010/10/01/2/bettiniphoto_0059854_1_full_600.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://cdn1.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net/2010/10/01/2/bettiniphoto_0059854_1_full_600.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><b>Carpani consults the bunch</b></i></td></tr></tbody></table><br />Speaking to<a href="http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-stand-by-race-radio-ban"> cyclingnews.com</a>, UCI spokesman Enrico Carpani suggests the governing body won't back down over the ban of race radios.<br /><blockquote><i>“We want to remind everyone that the decision has been taken with the participation of all the parties involved in the cycling movement. So the decision remains."</i> </blockquote>This is inflammatory stuff. Rather than buying time or calming people, it's the PR equivalent of two fingers. Why? Well it's saying the radio ban stays in place and it's not going to change. But it's also saying the UCI conducted a consultation exercise. Amusing, since the organisation that represents the teams says it wasn't consulted, the riders' rep Gianni Bugno says there wasn't dialogue and a poll of riders suggests they are considerably in favour of radios. <i>Just who did the UCI consult?</i><br /><br /><b>Stand off</b><br />I don't expect either side to back down overnight but using the media to raise the stakes is awkward, especially as the UCI appears to have a weak hand: it didn't consult properly and its threats risk looking shrill. The only hope is that the UCI is saying one thing in public whilst saying something different in private to the teams.<br /><br />But I suspect not. You don't have to be a master of political strategy to see that once you've got a public stalemate it only gets harder for each side to climb down. The more the stakes are raised, the greater the fall out. There is talk of a meeting happening during the Tour of Oman. This is going to require big diplomatic efforts to reach a suitable agreement. Yet Carpani's statements suggest the UCI is deaf to the team's concerns and in no way ready to compromise.<br /><br /><b>Divide and conquer</b><br />The UCI strategy seems to involve pitting teams against race organisers, knowing - as we see in Qatar - that the teams won't dare upset the likes of ASO and RCS. Sadly this means the disruption is likely to fall on the smaller races, the ones that are not owned by wealthy backers.<br /><br /><i>Rather than looking for resolution, both sides are ready for a clash.</i><br> 2013 2013 2013 <br><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cdn1.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net/2010/10/01/2/bettiniphoto_0059854_1_full_600.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://cdn1.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net/2010/10/01/2/bettiniphoto_0059854_1_full_600.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><b>Carpani consults the bunch</b></i></td></tr></tbody></table><br />Speaking to<a href="http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-stand-by-race-radio-ban"> cyclingnews.com</a>, UCI spokesman Enrico Carpani suggests the governing body won't back down over the ban of race radios.<br /><blockquote><i>“We want to remind everyone that the decision has been taken with the participation of all the parties involved in the cycling movement. So the decision remains."</i> </blockquote>This is inflammatory stuff. Rather than buying time or calming people, it's the PR equivalent of two fingers. Why? Well it's saying the radio ban stays in place and it's not going to change. But it's also saying the UCI conducted a consultation exercise. Amusing, since the organisation that represents the teams says it wasn't consulted, the riders' rep Gianni Bugno says there wasn't dialogue and a poll of riders suggests they are considerably in favour of radios. <i>Just who did the UCI consult?</i><br /><br /><b>Stand off</b><br />I don't expect either side to back down overnight but using the media to raise the stakes is awkward, especially as the UCI appears to have a weak hand: it didn't consult properly and its threats risk looking shrill. The only hope is that the UCI is saying one thing in public whilst saying something different in private to the teams.<br /><br />But I suspect not. You don't have to be a master of political strategy to see that once you've got a public stalemate it only gets harder for each side to climb down. The more the stakes are raised, the greater the fall out. There is talk of a meeting happening during the Tour of Oman. This is going to require big diplomatic efforts to reach a suitable agreement. Yet Carpani's statements suggest the UCI is deaf to the team's concerns and in no way ready to compromise.<br /><br /><b>Divide and conquer</b><br />The UCI strategy seems to involve pitting teams against race organisers, knowing - as we see in Qatar - that the teams won't dare upset the likes of ASO and RCS. Sadly this means the disruption is likely to fall on the smaller races, the ones that are not owned by wealthy backers.<br /><br /><i>Rather than looking for resolution, both sides are ready for a clash.</i><br>2013 2013 2013 <br> <a href="http://www.matrixar.com/" title="Matrix ">المصفوفة : أجمل الخلفيات والصور</a>

Admin
Admin

Posts : 64122
Join date : 2013-02-22

View user profile http://prowebsites1.forumaroc.net

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum